Added on 30/12/2011Law Case (upto 1950)

Rylands and Another v. Fletcher. 1868


House of Lords. 6th/7th/17th July 1868. Lord Cairns, L.C., and Lord Cranworth.



Although this case has nothing to do with trees, it is used as a principle for other cases which do involve trees.


The plaintiff owned a colliery with mine shafts that reached under the land of the defendant. The defendant built on his land a water reservoir, with its position located over the mine shafts. Many of the mine shafts were old and disused. The soil between the mine shafts and the base of the reservoir was unable to support the pressure of the water and subsequently collapsed causing the water to flood the mine. The plaintiff sought damages from the defendants in the Court of Exchequer Chamber in Feb 1866. Judgement was given to the plaintiff and the defendants appealed.

During the appeal it was held that, if a person brings or keeps anything on his land that should later escape and is a cause of damage to neighbouring properties, the owner is responsible for its effects no matter how careful he has been to retain that item.


In this situation the owner of the burst reservoir was judged as being responsible for the damages so their appeal was dismissed.



Although the above information is deemed to be true and correct, it is possible that errors may exist, henceforth the AIE can not accept any responsibility for any action which may arise from its use. It is recommended that prior to using such information for legal purposes or when instigating any kind of legal action, advice be first sought from a solicitor. Please read our Terms of Use.